By Paul O'Grady

Paul O'Grady's examine presents an in-depth research of Aquinas's contribution to the philosophy of faith. It starts off by way of situating him inside of that self-discipline and power objections to such an company are tested. Aquinas's contexts are then mentioned – old, biographical and conceptual. Aquinas's perspectives on philosophy and theology, and religion and cause are assessed. 3 arguments for the lifestyles of God are explored intimately – the argument from movement, the argument from contingency and the argument to layout. His responses to the matter of evil and the problem of naturalism are lined. His unfavorable method of God's nature is mentioned, together with his perspectives on divine simplicity and eternity, which, it truly is argued, are particular and theoretically fruitful. Then his confident account of divine goodness, wisdom and tool is explored, in addition to the linguistic concerns which come up from trying to speak about God.

Show description

Read or Download Aquinas's Philosophy of Religion PDF

Similar religious studies & reference books

Sexual Liberation: The Scandal of Christendom

Raymond J. Lawrence, Jr. had the heart to inform the real tale of Christianity. it's a very robust booklet filled with no longer such a lot of great issues yet enlightening. I take my hat off and congratulate this gentleman. He easily had the heart to set the list directly. while a person has the stature and valor to nation issues similar to, The critical end of this booklet is that Christianity made a catastrophic flip early in its improvement, a flip principally mounted within the fourth century C.

Sexual Liberation: The Scandal of Christendom (Psychology, Religion, and Spirituality)

Raymond J. Lawrence, Jr. had the center to inform the genuine tale of Christianity. it's a very robust publication packed with no longer such a lot of great issues yet enlightening. I take my hat off and congratulate this gentleman. He easily had the center to set the checklist instantly. while a person has the stature and valor to kingdom issues reminiscent of, The crucial end of this booklet is that Christianity made a catastrophic flip early in its improvement, a flip mostly mounted within the fourth century C.

Das Rätsel der Philosophie in ihrer Geschichte als Umriss dargestellt.

Verfolgt guy, was once von Menschen an Geistesarbeit geleistet worden ist, um die Lösung der Welträtsel und Lebensfragen zu versuchen, so drängen sich der betrachtenden Seele immer wieder die Worte auf, die im Tempel Apollons wie ein Wahrspruch aufgezeichnet waren: «Erkenne dich selbst». Daß die menschliche Seele beim Vorstellen dieser Worte eine gewisse Wirkung empfinden kann, darauf beruht das Verständnis für eine Weltanschauung.

Without Answers Vol 8

First released in 2003. Routledge is an imprint of Taylor & Francis, an informa corporation.

Extra info for Aquinas's Philosophy of Religion

Sample text

On death there was no personal immortality, which clashed with theistic views on afterlife. It was little wonder that Neoplatonicinspired theology would react negatively to Aristotle. Furthermore, Aristotle was mediated through Islamic thinkers who developed his work in different ways. Avicenna used some of Aristotle’s ideas to think about God and develop an argument for God’s existence using ideas of necessity and existence, which was to influence deeply Aquinas’s own thought on this. Averroes wrote lengthy technical commentaries on Aristotle which shaped how Aristotle had been received in the West.

The theist maintains that something with this description exists, while the theist denies this. Christians obviously think about God differently from the way pagans do, but nevertheless there is some continuity in their thinking. However, an important difference from the cat example is that there is no adequate scientific knowledge of God, for Aquinas. God’s ratio, a detailed scientific account of God’s nature, is in principle unavailable to us. This is because it exceeds our cognitive capacities.

34 Among the stock challenges are the charge that the conclusion (this is what we call God) does not follow from the premises and is too big a leap, that they are rooted in outmoded and wrong physics, that Philosophy and Theology 17 the use of regress arguments begs the question against atheism, and so on. D. Chenu, qtd. in Kerr]. Kerr usefully clarifies some of the concepts used in the arguments – noting how the notions of ‘cause’ and ‘substance’ in play are different from later usage and involve a much more dynamic picture of the world and of God than the static one usually assumed.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.96 of 5 – based on 13 votes